Provectus vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Provectus (4.6/5) edges ahead of Addepto (4.3/5) overall. Provectus is the better choice for AWS-centric companies adding generative AI. Addepto is the stronger option for manufacturers connecting AI to engineering data. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Provectus vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Provectus | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| HQ | Palo Alto, CA, USA | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | ~570 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | AWS Premier Tier status with a gen-AI practice built around Bedrock | Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM |
| Pricing model | Project-based and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) | Fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) |
| Min. engagement | $25,000+ (Clutch) | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | AWS Bedrock, Amazon SageMaker, Snowflake | Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Snowflake |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Financial services, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce |
Provectus vs Addepto: overview
Provectus
Provectus is an AI-first consultancy headquartered in Palo Alto and founded in 2010, with roughly 570 staff across North America, Latin America, and EMEA. It's an AWS Premier Tier services partner, and a 2026 job posting describes it as an Anthropic strategic partner (per company materials; independently unverifiable). Most of its integration work runs on Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker, which makes it a natural pick when the data and the identity system already live in AWS. Clutch lists a $50–$99 hourly band and a $25,000 project minimum.
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2018 and employs 50–100 people according to most directories (Clutch shows 50–249). KMS Technology acquired it in December 2025, and it continues as an independent subsidiary. Its focus is unusual. The integration work leans toward industrial and engineering data, connecting AI to supervisory control (SCADA), computer-aided design (CAD), and product lifecycle management (PLM) systems alongside more common document and analytics projects. Clutch lists a $10,000 minimum and a $50–$99 hourly band, one of the more accessible entry points on this list.
Services and capabilities: Provectus vs Addepto
| Capability | Provectus | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conversational AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Provectus vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | Provectus | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | N/A | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | ✓ | ✓ |
| Databricks | ✓ | ✓ |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | ✓ | N/A |
| Zendesk | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Provectus vs Addepto
| Criterion | Provectus | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25,000+ (Clutch) | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials, Dedicated team | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Provectus vs Addepto
| Dimension | Provectus | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Financial services, Retail & e-commerce | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics |
| Best use cases | Adding a retrieval assistant on top of documents stored in S3, Building agent workflows on Bedrock with existing IAM controls | Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end, Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope project | Fixed-scope project |
Provectus vs Addepto: pros and cons
| Provectus | |
|---|---|
| + | Premier Tier is the top level of the AWS partner network, and only a small share of partners hold it. |
| + | Bedrock-based builds keep data inside the client's existing AWS account boundaries. |
| + | Mixed delivery from the U.S. and Latin America keeps hourly rates in Clutch's middle band. |
| + | Data engineering and ML sit in the same team, so warehouse work and model work are scoped together. |
| - | Much less useful if your stack is Azure- or Google-first |
| - | The pilot is scoped as a regular project, with no published fixed-price pilot package |
| - | The $25K Clutch minimum is above what some small teams can spend on a first test |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | The $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment. |
| + | Experience with plant and engineering systems most AI vendors don't touch. |
| + | Clutch reviews average close to 4.9. |
| + | Data engineering and AI are scoped by the same team. |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025; long-term pricing and branding may change |
| - | Headcount varies a lot between directories |
| - | No managed-service offer for running systems after launch |
Who should choose Provectus?
A typical fit: adding a retrieval assistant on top of documents stored in S3.
AWS Premier Tier status with a gen-AI practice built around Bedrock. Minimum engagement starts at $25,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end.
Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce.
Decision matrix: Provectus vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a priced pilot before committing to a rollout | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot quote |
| You need someone to run and monitor the system after launch | Neither; plan for your own team to run it |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Addepto |
| The AI has to read and write in your CRM or ERP | Check each profile; neither lists CRM or ERP work |
| You need multi-step agents acting across systems | Provectus |
| You need a large team for a multi-year program | Provectus |
Use case fit: Provectus vs Addepto
| Use case | Provectus fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adding a retrieval assistant on top of documents stored in S3 | Strong | Limited | Provectus |
| Building agent workflows on Bedrock with existing IAM controls | Strong | Limited | Provectus |
| Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: Provectus vs Addepto
Provectus (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration Services projects. AWS Premier Tier status with a gen-AI practice built around Bedrock.
Addepto (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Provectus vs Addepto FAQ
Is Provectus better than Addepto?
Provectus (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Provectus's strongest advantage: premier Tier is the top level of the AWS partner network, and only a small share of partners hold it. Addepto's strongest advantage: the $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment.
How do Provectus and Addepto differ in pricing?
Provectus's pricing: project-based and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) with a minimum engagement of $25,000+ (Clutch). Addepto's pricing: fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: Provectus or Addepto?
Provectus is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Provectus and Addepto?
Provectus's primary differentiator is: AWS Premier Tier status with a gen-AI practice built around Bedrock. Addepto's primary differentiator is: integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. They also differ in team size (~570 vs 50–249), minimum engagement ($25,000+ (Clutch) vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Financial services vs Manufacturing, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.