Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Hitachi Solutions (4.4/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (4.1/5) overall. Hitachi Solutions is the better choice for dynamics 365 shops adding Copilot. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for enterprises with multi-year engineering budgets. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Hitachi Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1970 | 1993 |
| HQ | Tokyo, Japan (Americas: Irvine, CA) | Newtown, PA, USA |
| Team size | 3,000+ | 61,000+ |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A practice that works only on Microsoft technology, centered on Dynamics 365 | Engineering capacity across Europe, India, and the Americas for long AI programs |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope implementations and managed services; rates on request | Time & materials and dedicated teams; rates on request |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Microsoft Dynamics 365, Azure OpenAI, Microsoft Copilot Studio | Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Databricks |
| Industries served | Manufacturing, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce, Financial services | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media, Energy |
Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems: overview
Hitachi Solutions
Hitachi Solutions is part of Japan's Hitachi group, and its Microsoft business has more than 3,000 people in 14 countries, with the Americas run from Irvine, California. The parent company dates to 1970 as Hitachi Software Engineering. Its Microsoft practice works only on Microsoft technology, which makes it a strong fit for Dynamics 365 shops adding Copilot and Azure OpenAI features to finance, supply chain, or customer service. Copilot work contributed to its 2024 Microsoft Low Code Application Development Partner of the Year award (per company website; independently unverifiable).
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with over 61,200 employees at the end of 2025. Acquisitions shaped the recent mix: NEORIS (2024) for Latin America and Iberia, and First Derivative (completed December 2024) for financial-services data. Management targets more than $600 million of AI-native revenue in 2026, after reporting over $105 million in Q4 2025. Its AI/Run tooling and Agentic QA product support large engineering programs more than single-workflow pilots.
Services and capabilities: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Hitachi Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✗ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Conversational AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Hitachi Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | ✓ |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | ✓ | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | ✓ |
| Databricks | N/A | ✓ |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | N/A | ✓ |
| Zendesk | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Hitachi Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope project, Managed services | Time & materials, Dedicated team, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Hitachi Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Manufacturing, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce |
| Best use cases | Copilot features inside Dynamics 365 Finance for invoice matching, Supply-chain forecasting surfaced in Dynamics planning screens | Large data-platform programs that end in AI features, Agent development across several business units |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope project | Time & materials |
Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Hitachi Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Earned 252 new Microsoft certifications in FY25, including 50 advanced role-based ones. |
| + | Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain expertise is uncommon among AI vendors. |
| + | Managed services cover both the ERP and the AI features built on it. |
| + | Backed by the Hitachi group's balance sheet for multi-year programs. |
| - | Not a fit outside the Microsoft ecosystem |
| - | Founding year and headcount are reported differently for the parent and the Microsoft unit |
| - | Its AI work leans on Microsoft's built-in Copilot features rather than custom model routing |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Engineering depth to staff many workstreams at once. |
| + | Public reporting on AI-native revenue gives a measurable view of the practice. |
| + | First Derivative added capital-markets data skills. |
| + | Agentic QA product addresses testing of AI-generated code. |
| - | Acquisition-driven growth (NEORIS, First Derivative) means teams are still being integrated |
| - | Not built for a small fixed-price pilot |
| - | Management flagged slower organic growth in 2026 guidance |
Who should choose Hitachi Solutions?
A typical fit: copilot features inside Dynamics 365 Finance for invoice matching.
A practice that works only on Microsoft technology, centered on Dynamics 365. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce, Financial services.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: large data-platform programs that end in AI features.
Engineering capacity across Europe, India, and the Americas for long AI programs. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media, Energy.
Decision matrix: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a priced pilot before committing to a rollout | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot quote |
| You need someone to run and monitor the system after launch | Both offer managed services |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Hitachi Solutions (Not disclosed) vs EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) |
| The AI has to read and write in your CRM or ERP | Both have CRM or ERP integration work |
| You need multi-step agents acting across systems | EPAM Systems |
| You need a large team for a multi-year program | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Hitachi Solutions fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copilot features inside Dynamics 365 Finance for invoice matching | Strong | Limited | Hitachi Solutions |
| Supply-chain forecasting surfaced in Dynamics planning screens | Strong | Limited | Hitachi Solutions |
| Large data-platform programs that end in AI features | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| Agent development across several business units | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
Verdict: Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems
Hitachi Solutions (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration Services projects. A practice that works only on Microsoft technology, centered on Dynamics 365.
EPAM Systems (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need agent development across several business units. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Hitachi Solutions vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Hitachi Solutions better than EPAM Systems?
Hitachi Solutions (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Hitachi Solutions's strongest advantage: earned 252 new Microsoft certifications in FY25, including 50 advanced role-based ones. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: engineering depth to staff many workstreams at once.
How do Hitachi Solutions and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Hitachi Solutions's pricing: fixed-scope implementations and managed services; rates on request. EPAM Systems's pricing: time & materials and dedicated teams; rates on request. Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: Hitachi Solutions or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Hitachi Solutions and EPAM Systems?
Hitachi Solutions's primary differentiator is: a practice that works only on Microsoft technology, centered on Dynamics 365. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: engineering capacity across Europe, India, and the Americas for long AI programs. They also differ in team size (3,000+ vs 61,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Manufacturing, Logistics vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.